Pisut teistsugune postitus jällegi. Kuna mulle meeldib väga käia näitustel ning igal pool, mis mulle põnev tundub, siis ma haarasin sellest võimalusest kohe kinni ning mõtlesin seda lühidalt ka teiega jagada.
***
A bit different post this time again. As i enjoy going to exchibitions the most, and to all the places that attract me, so i took the chance and I also decided to give you a short review of it.
Nii kui läksin raamatukokku vaatama võõrkeelsete raamatute sekka, siis hakkas silma ka midagi endakeelset, vaadate kas te ka näete? :)
***
as soon as I went to the library I noticed a book in Estonian. Take a look.
Niisiis see näitus Behind. Nägin selle arvustust mu Rkv'i lemmikajalehes Reykjavik Grapewine (inglise keeles tasuta väljaanne.) ning see jättis mulle kohe alguses sügava mulje. Niisiis otsustasin minna ja asjale pilgu peale visata. Ja see oli tõesti sügavasisuline.
Ta pani mõtlema selle peale, et mis siis kui fotograafidel pannakse väga palju tähelepanu ainult sellele, mis on esiplaanil ning jäetakse märkamata see, mis on tagaplaanil. Ja tema näitus ongi sellest, mis on tagaplaanil, sellest ka nimi Behind.
***
I saw the description of the exchibition Behind in my favorite newspaper Reykjavik Grapewine (which is in English and it is completely free.) So it left me very good expression and I decided to go and check it out. And I wasnt't mistaken, it was very deep. It made me think about that in very many photos the main attention is paid on the things that stand in the front and this is why why we won't usually pay much attention on the things that are in the background. And this is what her excibition is about: the things that are behind, in the background.
There was also a branch from a tree which name I don't remember in English, if someone does please tell me, the picture is below. :)
Seal oli ka üks kuuseoks, mille kõrval oli selline kiri:
Kuigi minu pildi puhul on maagiline see tagataust ainult aimatav, kuid proovida tasus.
***
Even though the background of my picture is not very realizable, but definitely worth trying.
Eriti nende piltide puhul tekkis mul just eriti suur taju selle suhtes, et saan tema mõttest aru, et mis siis kui inimese nägu ei ole näha ja inimene on justkui objekt pildi esiplaanil ning ma avastasin end keskendumas hoopis sügavamalt pildi tagataustale. Et mis siis kui raam aknalt eest ära võtta ja raami taha püüda näha?
Ma kujutasin ette kuidas ma lähen aknast välja ja vaatan, mis on mujal väljas. Väga huvitav on nii mõelda, vaadates pilte tähelepanelikumalt ja lähemalt kui muidu. Aga selleks ongi sellised näitused loodud. Et tuua välja mugavustsoonist ja aidata vaadata mujale kui muidu vaatame.
***
Especially in those pictures I had the feeling that I really know what the author meant by this title Behind, as there is no face be seen in the picture and when person is taken like an object in front of the picture then I realized that I paid more attention on the things that were in the background. And what if I could take the frame of the window off and try to see what is behind the window?
I imagined myself going outside the window and looking around there outside. It is very interesting to think this way, look closer than most of us will. This is the reason why these kind of exchibitions are for. In order to bring us out of the comfort zone and help us look at the opposite direction than we usually look at.
***
And what do you see behind this lad? What kind of room is behind him?Especially with this picture we could concentrate on his face, but since there is no face you can only look at the things that are behind him
***
Something about the other different exchibition that was in the side hall. Something from Iceland's historical city. I didn't point out the real point of this exchibition thought.
***
thousand ways of using scarfs.
No comments:
Post a Comment